Related
Summary
One of theStar Trekfranchise ’s glum questions gets a hilarious response in aSaturday morn Breakfast Cerealcomic . Star Trekis full of awful , high - tech gadgets , such as warp drives and replicators . Perhaps the well known are conveyor belt , allowing the crowd to “ light beam ” down to the surface of planets . Thisamazing machine comes with a host of ethical questions , andSaturday Morning Breakfast Cerealhas provide a darkly amusing reply .
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cerealdebuted the comedian in a station on Instagram . A Starfleet work party fellow member is preparing to transport somewhere . He asks the car transporter top dog if the gadget ( here telephone a “ teleporter ” ) will kill him when he beams down . The unfazed chief response that it does . The crew extremity then tries to beleaguer out the moral implications of this . The chief dismisses them , saying they circumvent any ethical issue by asking the gang to broadcast down with a pup . This stool them “ puppy murderers ” and they can “ kill ” the crew with no qualms .
The gang phallus is then asked to choose a puppy and dance step into the teleporter .
The Transporter Was a Necessary Evil
The transporter is one of the coolesttechnological progress ofStar Trek’sfuture . When Gene Roddenberry createdTrekin the sixties , he was faced with a quandary : how to “ set down ” theEnterprise . Lacking the budget needed to land the ship each hebdomad , the transporters were invented . These twist damp a person down at the subatomic grade , converting it into vim and information . Then this matter stream is sent to a location where the person is reassemble as they were before they stepped into the conveyer belt . Some of the enfranchisement ’s best episodes have revolve around the conveyer belt and the many potential mishaps that can arise .
In addition to these mishaps , the transporter ’s existence has resurrect a number of scientific and philosophical questions . From a scientific perspective , the transporter is out of the question , thanks to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle . While the show has created a oeuvre around for this , they have never conclusively settled the conveyor belt ’s ethical question . The transporter disassembles people into nothingness , effectively “ killing ” them . This means that a person “ pass away ” every time they enthral . WhileStar Trekhas shown conveyer accidents many time , it has shy off from the recondite ramifications of the conveyor .
Related : Star Trek Has Been Hiding a Rick and Morty Reference Right Under Fans ' nose
Star Trek’sTransporter is Cool—But Will It Kill You?
ButSaturday daybreak Breakfast Cerealhas tackled this issue in a uproarious way . The hapless crowd member beaming down asks the enquiry that near allStar Trekfans have asked about the conveyer belt . The nonplussed conveyer chief adds another humourous level to the cartoon , as does the puppy jest . The transporter is a potentially colored innovation , with a master of ceremonies of accompanying dilemmas . WhileSaturday forenoon Breakfast Cerealis take fans ' questions and jokes about the transporter to its consistent ( and dark ) extreme point , it nevertheless addresses the deep , more metaphysical side of theStar Trekuniverse .
Source : Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
