The Little Mermaid
Summary
optical effects artists excuse why a 2013 horror flick pulls off one optical trick better than Disney’sThe Little Mermaidremake . Released in 2023 , Disney ’s live - activity remake of their 1989 enliven classic was reportedly made on a budget of $ 297 million . For that monumental investment , the studio was reinforce with a flick that take in $ 569 million at the worldwide box office , making it the seventh - highest - grossing Disney remake to day of the month .
$ 297 million may buy a lot of high-pitched - end comupter beget visual effects , but according to a bunch of VFX artists , theLittle Mermaidremakewas outdo by a pic from ten class to begin with that cost $ 282 million less . In breaking down the underwater hair force from the Disney film , theCorridor Crewguys recall the Jessica Chastain horror movieMama , praising the $ 15 million moving-picture show for its creepy-crawly ghostwriter , and the way that moving-picture show ’s VFX artists run into the weird valley effect to create an otherworldly atmosphere . hold back out the remark from the gang below :
Now we looked at Little Mermaid , and we look at pilus and underwater hair , and how even though she ’d move in dissimilar way , the hair would n’t follow the laws of physics , and we ’re talking about , does it break our immersion , does it make it find cartoony , does it not make it sense cartoony . Well , what if instead of worrying about adjudicate to match reality , you just squeeze the fact that you are founder the law of natural philosophy and use that to make something creepy-crawly and weird and formidable .
So I actually think the Mama effects are extremely well - done . The bm is crazy , the sitting is crazy , the design of the face is really distressful .
Using the tomentum , to have it just be incessantly floating and disobeying the laws of gravity really makes it a ghost . It ’s using the uncanny vale for filmmaking purposes . It ’s like , countenance ’s rent VFX be slightly fracture and countenance ’s use that to make it creepy .
Mama Paved the Way For IT (And Might Be Creepier)
Andy Muschietti made his feature film directorial debut with2013’sMama , a supernatural chiller about a distich of orphaned child coming under the careen of a creepy-crawly wood smell . Made for just $ 15 million , the film gross an telling $ 148 million . Muschietti would afterwards go on to mastermind the two - part Stephen King adaptationIT , collectively budgeted at just under $ 120 million , and then an even openhanded pic in 2023’sThe Flash , budget at $ 300 million .
Muschietti adaptedMamaform his own earlier scant picture show .
Despite its comparatively modest terms rag , Mamaboasts memorable visual effects from Mr. X , effects that , in the estimation of Corridor Crew , outdo the much - bigger - budgetedThe Little Mermaid . Muschietti himself would go on to have a much giving budget onIT , but it can be argue that even the evilPennywise the Clownisn’t as creepy-crawly as the tortured supernatural entity at the center ofMama . ITmay have been a swelled triumph for Muschietti in terms of box spot , but with its ingenious effect , Mamamight be a majuscule acquirement when it issue forth to generating a pure mother wit of fright .
Source : Corridor Crew
